Sure! Here’s the translation into American English:
—
Recent advancements in the field of neurotechnology have sparked an intense debate about the ethical and social implications they entail. During a recent conversation between neuroscientist Rafael Yuste and human rights lawyer Jared Genser, both agreed that while these innovations may offer new forms of communication for individuals with brain injuries or degenerative diseases, they also raise serious concerns about privacy and mental control.
Yuste, who led the BRAIN initiative, explained how neurotechnology has evolved from theoretical research to practical applications in the medical field. Examples such as the development of non-invasive devices that allow for the decoding of internal speech in paralyzed individuals highlight the transformative potential of these technologies in human communication. However, this advancement comes with a dark side.
Genser warned that as these devices begin to penetrate the market, current regulations are insufficient to protect users. An alarming number of available products enable companies to handle and commercialize neural data without explicit consent from individuals. This poses serious risks in a context where privacy is at stake.
Both experts have established the Neurorights Foundation, an initiative dedicated to creating a legal framework that ensures the protection of mental rights and prevents manipulation of brain information. Genser emphasized that it is crucial for any regulation to be based on international human rights standards to protect individuals from abusive practices.
With the rapid development of this technology, Yuste and Genser underscored the need for legislation to evolve in parallel with scientific advancements. Otherwise, innovations could become a double-edged sword, where the benefits offered by neurotechnology are overshadowed by threats to privacy and personal autonomy.
—
Feel free to ask if you need any further assistance!
Source: MiMub in Spanish
