At a critical moment for internet regulation in the United States, several senators are considering the possibility of drastically modifying one of the most relevant laws for protecting online users: Section 230 of the U.S. Code. This norm is essential, as it determines that online service providers cannot be held responsible for content created by users, which has been fundamental for the growth of communication and expression on the web.
Despite arguments against Section 230, suggesting that its removal could hinder moderation practices against harmful online behaviors, it is crucial to understand that this law not only benefits big tech companies. Its true impact is especially felt in small platforms and users who do not have the resources to create their own media outlets. By removing this protection, there is a risk of crushing small businesses and communities that rely on third-party platforms to express their ideas and opinions.
Detractors of Section 230 often argue that the law allows abuses and harmful behaviors to perpetuate. However, studies show that many online services, despite their protection under this legislation, are already taking steps to moderate content and manage inappropriate behaviors. In fact, if Section 230 is revoked, unintended consequences could arise: platforms might be disincentivized from moderating content out of fear of assuming legal responsibilities. This could ultimately foster an online environment where the most toxic and harmful behaviors prevail.
The importance of Section 230 also lies in granting users the ability to interact, organize, and create content without fear of legal repercussions. By upholding this law, the right of each individual to freely express themselves is protected, without the government or corporations arbitrarily deciding what content is acceptable.
In a context where online speech is under constant scrutiny, it becomes imperative for Congress to listen not only to big platforms, but also to small services and common users who would be severely affected by any changes to this law. The discussion around Section 230 should focus on defending the right of all citizens to participate in the digital space safely and without repercussions. The need for a balanced approach that considers the impact on digital communities is more relevant than ever.
Referrer: MiMub in Spanish
