EFF Joins as Amicus Curiae in Defense of Perkins Coie Law Firm Against an Unconstitutional Executive Order

Recently, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has joined forces with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and various legal defense organizations of different ideologies to file an amicus brief before a federal judge. This document requests the nullification of an executive decree issued by former President Donald Trump, which imposes restrictions on the law firm Perkins Coie, known for its work in defending voting rights and representing political opponents of the government.

With nearly 35 years of defending the rights of technology users, the EFF has expressed its support for Perkins Coie’s resistance to what it deems an unconstitutional and vindictive mandate. In its argument, the EFF maintains that the decree, enacted on March 6, not only violates the First Amendment, but also undermines the rule of law and the integrity of the legal profession. The organization emphasizes that lawsuits against the federal government are a vital component of the system of checks and balances that underpins American democracy.

The document warns that, if the decree remains in force, pressure tactics will have a detrimental impact on citizens’ ability to access legal advice on crucial matters, as well as affecting their right to organize their personal and business affairs as they see fit. The text underscores that enforcing the decree would break a tradition and set a troubling precedent, where law firms representing clients adversarial to an administration could be punished for fulfilling their professional duty.

This scenario is described as an abuse of executive power, presenting serious constitutional issues, including a violation of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from manipulating the legal system by controlling the arguments lawyers can make. Additionally, the decree is interpreted as an unconstitutional retaliation against Perkins Coie for exercising a right protected by the Constitution during representation of their clients. The separation of powers and the right of litigants to choose their defenders, protected by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, would also be at risk.

The EFF concludes its statement urging the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to promptly nullify the decree and calling on the legal profession as a whole to condemn this action. With some major law firms choosing not to confront this issue, the EFF highlights the urgent need for the legal community to unite in defense of these fundamental principles that uphold democracy and the rule of law.

via: MiMub in Spanish

Scroll to Top