Not everyone needs a digital identity, and that’s okay.

Every week, many people take out their driver’s license between two and four times to perform tasks that require identification, such as buying age-restricted products or picking up medications. However, with the introduction of mobile driver’s licenses (mDL) and other types of digital identification (ID) available in Google and Apple wallets, the frequency with which identification is presented could increase significantly. This new technology has the potential to extend situations where ID needs to be shown, sparking a debate about the privacy and security of personal data.

The deployment of mDLs and digital IDs is advancing at a rapid pace, surpassing states’ capacity to develop adequate privacy protections. While advocates for these digital initiatives highlight the convenience they offer, the use of these identifications could expand into controversial scenarios, such as age verification projects that could end up censoring broad sectors of the population. Furthermore, they are being tested in sensitive situations, raising fears about an unprecedented data surveillance regime.

Within the debate over digital IDs, the crucial question it poses is how to implement this system correctly, setting aside the most fundamental: should we do it in the first place? While recommended safeguards exist for these new technologies, it is essential to respect each individual’s right to choose whether they want to continue using physical documentation rather than opting for digital. Significant effort is needed to empower citizens, giving them understanding and control over these technologies rather than promoting them unequivocally as an equitable solution.

The modernization of hardware allows phones to securely store more sensitive data, facilitating the use of services like Google Pay and Apple Pay. These functions use a “Trusted Platform Module” (TPM) that protects sensitive data in a secure environment within the device. Therefore, if a user stores an mDL on their phone, it is not synced to the cloud, giving the option to remotely wipe the credential in case of loss or theft.

Throughout the summer, the debate over digital IDs has gained momentum. An example often cited by its advocates is showing proof of age at a bar, where a bouncer can verify that one is over 21 without knowing additional personal information. However, this apparent privacy comes at a considerable cost. mDLs will not only replace physical IDs but are likely to increase the number of situations in which businesses and government agencies will demand that people prove their identity, potentially multiplying the exposure of personal data to third parties.

Through advances in digital ID technology, certain applications are already in use by the TSA, although their use is expected to expand. Additionally, Google and Apple are competing in the realm of age verification, which could make it easier for any entity to request identification online. This aspect has special implications for content considered harmful to minors, such as information about LGBTQIA topics or resources related to abortion.

In the context of equity, the application of digital IDs must be designed with an inclusive approach and considering the difficulties facing the most vulnerable populations. Many citizens lack a smartphone or do not have access to an updated device, which may hinder their ability to access services that rely on digital identification. While digital IDs are proposed to streamline everyday processes, the fact that millions of people remain without access to basic documentation raises questions about the effectiveness and equity of these solutions.

In conclusion, the adoption of digital identity should not be considered inevitable. While many may see advantages in their use, there is a considerable spectrum of individuals who do not wish to use these systems or who lack the necessary resources to access them. For digital identity to be truly beneficial, it is essential to legislate protections that defend citizens’ privacy and ensure equal access to services, regardless of how they choose to identify themselves.

Source: MiMub in Spanish

Scroll to Top
×