Sure! Here’s the translation into American English:
<div itemprop="text"><p>The increasing number of security alerts in software development has become a challenge for many programmers, who face a constant barrage of notifications about vulnerabilities. The efficiency of tools like Dependabot has been highlighted; however, the lack of an intelligent method for prioritizing these alerts can lead to ineffective time management, especially when developers find themselves caught between the urgency of minor issues and the need to address critical vulnerabilities.</p><p>Recently, the use of the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) has been discussed as a tool to transform the management of security alerts. This system, along with the properties of code repositories, can help teams make more informed decisions when prioritizing these vulnerabilities. In a context where 96% of modern applications rely on open-source software, it becomes crucial not only to identify but also to effectively prioritize vulnerabilities.</p><p>Traditionally, many organizations have relied on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) to assess the severity of vulnerabilities. However, this system does not provide a complete picture since not all vulnerabilities classified as “critical” are equally likely to be exploited. The EPSS, in contrast, measures the likelihood that a vulnerability will be successfully exploited within 30 days, offering a more nuanced view that complements the severity scores of the CVSS.</p><p>To improve prioritization, it is suggested to combine the scores from both systems, as well as take advantage of the features of the specific repository, considering factors such as its public or private nature and the sensitivity of the information it handles. It is also recommended to establish clear Service Level Agreements (SLAs) based on risk levels, allowing for the proper classification of the urgency of each alert.</p><p>GitHub has facilitated this management by offering self-classification rules that enable teams to create customized criteria tailored to the specific needs of their projects. This approach not only optimizes the management of security alerts but also provides a framework for redirecting resources towards vulnerabilities that truly require attention.</p><p>Organizations that manage to implement effective prioritization can see notable improvements in their security management. Studies indicate that focusing on the 10% of vulnerabilities that are most likely to be exploited can lead to a coverage of 87%, which also reduces remediation efforts by 83%. This approach not only results in significant savings of time and resources but also fosters greater understanding and collaboration among teams regarding security decisions.</p><p>To start managing security alerts effectively, it is suggested to enable security updates provided by Dependabot, establish self-classification rules, and define clear prioritization criteria. With these practices, teams can reduce alert overload, ensuring that their efforts are directed towards maintaining secure code and effectively protecting their clients.</p></div>Let me know if there’s anything else you need!
via: MiMub in Spanish
