Sure! Here’s the translation into American English:
The California legislature has taken an important step by passing Bill S.B. 524, which aims to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in the drafting of police reports. Attention now turns to Governor Gavin Newsom’s decision, as he must sign the bill for it to be implemented.
The need for clear regulation becomes evident in light of the growing use of AI-based technologies in law enforcement. While these tools hold promise, they can compromise critical aspects such as transparency and the accuracy of the information generated, a fact that has raised concerns among public defenders and professionals in the judicial system.
One of the leading companies in this sector, Axon, has launched its product called Draft One, which uses advanced technology and body cameras to draft reports. However, this solution has serious drawbacks, as it may overlook important nuances in communication, including cultural and linguistic aspects. Even though officers are expected to review the AI-generated versions, many may rely unconditionally on the software, potentially leading to significant errors.
The King County prosecutor in Washington has already taken concrete action by banning the use of Draft One due to its lack of reliability, highlighting growing concerns about the accuracy and trustworthiness of these systems. Additionally, there is a risk of dishonesty in reports, allowing officers to excuse themselves if their testimony differs from the account generated by the AI, which could hinder accountability.
A recent study has indicated that Draft One is capable of evading the required transparency, intentionally obscuring which parts of a report were written by an officer and which by artificial intelligence. This lack of clarity must be urgently addressed.
The recent approval of S.B. 524 provides a crucial opportunity for California, following the lead of other states like Utah, to establish clear regulations in this area. The law stipulates that every report drafted by AI must include a notice on each page and retain the first draft, allowing interested parties such as defense attorneys or judges to discern between human contributions and those generated by machines. It also requires officers to sign and verify the accuracy of the reports and prohibits the sale of police information to third parties by AI providers.
These reforms are a necessary step toward a more responsible and transparent use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement. In this context, Axon’s Draft One product would not be compatible with the new standards, forcing the company to make significant modifications.
Transparency advocates are calling on the public to join in urging Governor Newsom to sign S.B. 524 and promote a more transparent future for the use of artificial intelligence in policing.
via: MiMub in Spanish
